The New New ft. Scott Elias + lots of other interesting people
Two
weekends in April, Scott Elias organized 9 speakers to come talk to us about
their careers and experiences in advertising (or marketing). From a partner at
a venture capital firm to an R&D lead at Johnson & Johnson, we were
lucky enough to hear from a wide variety of perspectives in different
categories.
The
speakers:
o Chris Paik – Partner
§ Thrive Capital
o Spencer Rice – CMO
§ SoulCycle
o Adrian Chernoff – R&D, Innovation
§ Johnson & Johnson
o Stinson Parks – Digital content lead
§ Mountain Dew
o Nicole Gill – Director, PR
§ Formerly SKD Knickerbocker
o Rachel Tipograph – Founder
§ Mik Mak
o Yoni Ben-Yehuda – CMO
§ Formerly Blue Mountain Media
o Matt Cynamon – VP community management
§ General Assembly
o Scott MacEachern – Founder
§ The Wizdom Project
In
a time when every category is as saturated as ever, and anyone, anywhere, can
launch their own business through the internet, it’s as important as ever to focus
on innovation and differentiation.
There were a lot of topics and themes covered
during the meetings, ranging from how to start your own app, to the conception
of a Super Bowl soft drink commercial using a 3-part-puppy-baby-monkey hybrid, while themes
discussed included the relevance of social cause in consumer advertising as
well as the re-emergence of existing products and businesses in new forms via
new channels. My biggest takeaway, though, was the significance, or
insignificance, age and experience played (age and experience’s role in today’s
marketplace is something I’ve already spent a lot of time discussing with
coworkers and classmates) in the path of three of the speakers: Chris from
Thrive, Rachel from MikMak and Matt from General Assembly.
All
3 of the speakers I mentioned above, I believe, were in their late twenties,
and all 3 were extremely capable and successful. This was the first topic I
brought up when telling friends about the speakers (which may serve to strengthen
the stereotype of millennials being entitled, but that’s another discussion) we
were lucky enough to see during the course and I think all 3 made it quite
evident that age and experience shouldn’t be the end all when considering whom
is most qualified, who will have the best ideas, or who will be the best leader
to guide a brand into the future. In fact, I think as the market becomes more
and more flexible and companies must be more and more agile, responding quickly
and adapting to and utilizing new technologies and platforms quickly, the
younger generation will be more qualified
to lead these companies (Rachel’s position as a “reverse-mentor” at Time Warner,
a practice I absolutely think more companies must consider to remain relevant,
summed this up perfectly).
Of course, the
way we heavily prioritize age and experience, even sometimes to the neglect of
ability or skill, is cultural and ingrained cultural norms are nearly
impossible to change, but I think that what’s happening currently is the first
time in a long time that people are giving real thought to seeing the younger
generation as leaders in the field - not those who have to be taught, but those
who may have a lot to teach.
All
the speakers we heard from over the course had unique and unexpected
perspectives to bring, and hearing from them definitely brought something to
the class that we would’ve had an impossible time finding in text. I can’t say
enough about having the opportunity to hear from these people, in the industry
and outside the industry, who each had a valuable story to tell and valuable
insight into the brands and businesses we interact with every day in ways that
we might never think of.